• Overview, Irritation Alert!

in the blind spot

~ Philosophy in the Dystopian Context

in the blind spot

Tag Archives: physics

Playful Spirit and the B-Bang

Featured

Posted by Sandy MacDonald in Embodiment, Freedom, Nature, Subjectivity

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Big Bang, freedom, ideality, nature, physics, play, spirit, time

Fragment 200, word count: 391.

tags: time, spirit, ideality, physics, Big Bang, play, freedom, nature.

When you get right down to spirit and physics, spirit is primary in yet another sense. Spirit plays in a way inconceivable for physics. Spirit plays at the ragged new edge of nature-unfinished, as a busy principle of world organization that organizes a world in the form of an unfinished person in an unfinished world. It personifies this edge of existence as itself, localized but stretched in time by its ideality, by its memory-based knowing, by caring and anticipating, and by an active intent to shape a personal future. This time-stretch of ideality introduces locally a degree of freedom for spontaneous creativity, for improvisation. Spirit (ideality) occurs as a multitude of localizing and dramatizing principles of suppositional world organization, at the raw edge of time, a multitude that is scattered but clustered, each one organizing a sense of personal surroundings in which to carry on a life according to the principle of personal caring and agency as an animate biological body with certain sensitivities and kinaesthetic powers within the surroundings. Each fabricates a sensibility, a personal and complex vigilance in aid of its agency. Each one is busy extending its suppositional sense of surroundings as contextual readiness to make sense of whatever might be coming. Freedom is possible in an unsettled world still just bursting into its existence. If you think of the Big Bang not simply as a something blowing up but instead as the bursting forth of existence at the foundational cosmic level, then time is still the Big Bang, a breaking-open of existence, the ongoing bursting forth of existence-as-incomplete. The present is the raw edge of the breaking-open, the wave front of the burst-into-existence. Human time, the stretched time of ideality, has taken nature in this aspect of instability and made it into personalized and personally guided mutability. With intent to burst forth personally, spirit reads nature’s instability as futurity, the opening for intentional agency, using foresight, memory, discretionary will, aesthetic judgments, and power to overcome even its regularity of habits for the sake of making a distinctive personal mark on the world that doesn’t yet exist. Spirit differs from inertial actuality by suppositional planning ahead, making guesses and choices among alternative plausible futures, whereas the objects of ‘just there’ actuality remain un-playful, the media of immutable forces.

Copyright © 2023 Sandy MacDonald.

What Knowing Is

Featured

Posted by Sandy MacDonald in Blind spots in thinking, Embodiment, Subjectivity, Transcendence

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

drama, existence, metaphysics, physics, reality, spirituality, time, transcendence

Fragment 184, word count: 198.

tags: existence, reality, drama, physics, metaphysics, spirituality, time, transcendence.

Spirituality has nothing to do with immortality, eternity, or qualifying for immortality. Instead, spirituality is bringing drama to existence, so, knowing the passing of time.

Awareness of the boundless world of enduring structures and processes, cycles repeating within cycles, a world that doesn’t matter to itself and doesn’t care, discover, or regret but goes on existing and shape shifting, structured and complex but just falling through the ways of least resistance: physical reality! Any beholding and knowing such physical reality expresses and demonstrates an order of existence which is different and higher than physics, an order of existence which does care and which questions, discovers, supposes, and contextualizes: the order of existence which is ordinary subjective spirituality. The physical universe cannot identify you and me, but we identify the physical universe. The physical universe can’t care what happens. It doesn’t wonder or fashion a demeanour expressing curiosity or determination. In no sense can it identify and remember the features of a context for initiatives, a framework of orientation and purpose. Metaphysical reality is exactly the power to construct some understanding of the system of physical reality, to construct an appreciation of the existence of a world of objects.

Another step:

Fragment 182, November 4, 2021, The Thrill of It (word count: 335).

Copyright © 2022 Sandy MacDonald.

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • December 2025
  • October 2025
  • August 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • December 2024
  • August 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Categories

  • Blind spots in thinking
  • Class War
  • Culture
  • disinterestedness
  • Embodiment
  • Equality
  • Freedom
  • Gender culture
  • Hierarchy
  • Leadership
  • Narrative
  • Nature
  • Political Power
  • Strategic thinking
  • Subjectivity
  • Transcendence
  • Uncategorized
  • University
  • Why thinking?

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • in the blind spot
    • Join 84 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • in the blind spot
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar