Encountering Subjectivity

Rebalancing Inward and Outward in Personal Identity

The description of human intelligence as “being-in-the-world” is a way of expressing the existentialist observation that the being of intelligence is outside-in. On an extreme version of that, intelligence has no inside at all and has no choice but to construct an external mask or icon to represent itself. Trophy culture, for example, is a version of that. With trophy culture a person demonstrates or constructs a self-portrait by entering competitions and accumulating a record of results, which are trophies when things go well. On that view, you are what you own. Trophy culture has huge mainstream support. Everybody in the star system is committed to it, and evaluates the world from within it. On that ground, envy is the right-wing theory of everything.

Outside is Not Simple

No one is ever aware of nature or culture except as scanned, filtered, sampled, probed, and then imaginatively re-constituted, re-modeled, or re-mixed by their struggling intelligence in desperate flight. These are operations of subjectivity. It isn’t knowledge that fountains up from subjectivity but rather what might be called inspiration, questing. Action does result and skepticism does not apply.

A common concept of knowledge is one in which the consciousness is a receptive slate upon which, little by little, is stamped a representation of the non-personal world, nature. Knowledge consists of impressions, data, projections from the determinate, given, immutable objective nature leaving an imprint on the pristine receptivity of consciousness. “Knowledge” is a sort of property, an appropriation or incorporation of the external not-self.

“Man is the measure of all things” (Protagoras of Abdera, sophist) refers to the fact that anyone’s impression of the measurable world will be edited and evaluated in terms of that person’s location and sensitivities, as well as biases, projects, needs, wishes, and fears, acquired often from ambient culture. There are personal and cultural filters. There is no such thing as a pure disinterested blank slate, no ‘pure’ cognitive rationality. All consciousness weighs and measures the impediments and resistances which enclose and restrict its getting further.

Perception is not an isolated mental condition, but exists in intimate involvement with speculating on probable futures, imagining, negating, remembering, searching and selecting, feeling gratification or irritation, and striving to make some imagined possibility into reality. There is more to thinking than soaking up data and facts about the measurable world. Every individual’s innate mental process is a source of curiosity, orientation, and questioning. Each individual is a source of selective questions and structuring creativity in combination with a specific and limited capacity to sense and make sense of externally supplied data. That is part of the ‘desperate flight’ of intelligence.

The World We Project

The human body’s sense organs are no simple opening between intelligence and the ‘real’ contents of the world. You search for dandelions in your grass and you don’t see any, and don’t see any, and then you see one and then another and then lots that must have been there all along. A curve drawn on paper does not have to be perfectly round and regular or completely closed to be seen as a circle. An observer will ‘fix’ imperfections, and see an ideal circle. We ‘read’ that mark drawn on paper on the basis of the briefest possible encounter, the quickest impression, and read it as ‘meaning’ a perfect circle. Rather than merely opening to let the world in, a person invents and constructs a reading process to relate brief and fleeting sensations with more enduring mental models, patterns, dreams, and narratives which are simple, schematic, and ideal.

To some indefinite extent, see what we look for, we see ideas. The pieces of the world we live among, we’ve domesticated them, made cut-outs and icons, myth-pieces of them. We see the myth of the material object, democracy, socialism, Canadianism, liberalism, or the myth of the wisdom of the free market, the myth of money. Many of these are parts of language-borne narratives taught us by our closest community.

We have a sense of the wholeness of things, the whole world of Eternity, within which local objects and events are placed. That awareness comes with human consciousness and not from sensations of local objects and incidents. The wholeness of the world is not perceivable by the senses, but is known by the perceiving mind. We can be in Eternity by contemplating even relatively simple forms: the beach, the night sky, art. These simplicities enable us to touch something of, or allow an intuition of, an Eternity we ourselves bring to experience. It is an intuition of intelligent subjectivity which cannot be an object to itself.

Copyright © 2011 Sandy MacDonald. The moral right of the author is asserted.

 

What Do We Want From Thinking?

Building a sustainable and gratifying life is normally a person’s main thinking project. What we want from thinking breaks that down into something like the following list.

We want a life-sustaining engagement with nature. We want to know nature’s beauty and wonder, and to draw from its fruitfulness of food, energy, and other comforts and sustainers of life. (Science helps with this.)

We want to participate in authentic and loving attachments. We want to be enlarged and inspired by attachment to others, by encounters with great writings and works of others, to rise above self-absorption to experience a sense of disinterested justice and a devotion to justice. We want to inherit the whole legacy of human discovery, insight, and accomplishment.

We want to function competently in a cooperative production and exchange operation. (Vocational and professional programs emphasize this.)

A life can be analyzed as a system of production, consumption, and exchange but there are also considerations of subjectivity acting to relish personal intelligence and animal embodiment, as well as child nurturing family life, communal engagement, and a strictly personal orientation to cosmic god or nature. Sensing the importance of that whole range of interests, we want to protect ourselves from being enslaved, stunted, and exploited by production organizations or grandiose cultural spooks such as nations, religions, and corporations which promote and reward types of ‘groupthink’. Placed as thinking is between forces for social control and impulses for self-possession, we must be wary of stealthy attempts at external control of thinking. We want to protect ourselves from having our self-definition diminished by cultural categories and culturally assigned values. We want to understand the political, social, and economic issues engulfing us, legacies and realities of perennial class wars. (Humanities studies, history, literature, philosophy contribute to this.)

We want to create a personal mark on natural and cultural surroundings with the freedom enabled by deliberation and creativity. Labyrinthine subjectivity can present a challenge here. Freedom can’t be merely letting the subjective buzzing buzz and the bubbling bubble, although innocent play is a dimension of freedom. Innocent subjectivity alone and unfocused can be a bog of isolation, powerlessness, and nowhereness. A sort of thinking to experience freedom and self-possession needs development of a personal voice, a voice-avatar. Deliberation, discretionary actions, and creativity are required for expressive power, and those all share persistence and perseverance in building a unity of effort. That is building artifacts and complex orientations from the buzzing and bubbling. The same skill and impulse applies to digging into and investigating nature and culture. Digging can be building, carving out a shaped opening, a path through the wild unknown.

With thinking, innocence equals play, and for adults that includes the power to build in unsupervised authorship. The special thinking in focus here could be called deliberative play, the practiced creative process. (See also TED Talks, “The Play Manifesto”, Bulgaria.) However, the really revolutionary thing about play is that it is self-generated and removes much of the need to engage with markets.

We want to be fully acquainted with personal nature as intelligence without forfeiting animal embodiment, sensuality, and groundedness. We want to engage the experience of transcendence, the supra-natural freedom of intelligence. We want to be acquainted with that profundity that was hinted at or channeled by religion: to be in the world but not of it.

Copyright © 2011 Sandy MacDonald. The moral right of the author is asserted.

 

The Personal Use of Thinking

“In the blind spot” refers first to the observation: “Thinking is an act of subjectivity, and subjectivity is the blind spot of science.”. Science is not going to help us much with the personal use of thinking. Science also tries to stay clear of politics and the personal use of thinking is definitely political. However, even though thinking is an act of subjectivity, it is not performed in isolation from nature, culture, or history. In fact the meaning of “in the blind spot” could be extended to focus on history. History is a blind spot in all of us, because we just weren’t there and we need so much of our energy and attention to survive the present. Learning something helpful about history is a painstaking process and there is too much to permit a really thorough thinking through it. Unfortunately, ignorance of history does not free us from the influence of the past. It is worth making some effort to reduce the ignorance and to build a better sense of what looms over us in that blind spot.

Copyright © 2011 Sandy MacDonald. The moral right of the author is asserted.